Maybe someone could clear this up for me: the new messiah, aka Barak Hussein Obama, keeps going on and on about how we need more troops in Afganistan, we need to do more over there, blah, blah, blah, and I think he is over there right now.

If he is so dead set against the Iraq war and supposedly was never for it, what is the difference here? Why is he so for sending more troops and doing more in Afganistan? Is it because he just wants to do the opposite of Bush? And why are the liberal biased media going along over on his overseas trips to make a big circus out of it?

buzzie - 19 July 2008 08:17 AM

Maybe someone could clear this up for me: the new messiah, aka Barak Hussein Obama, keeps going on and on about how we need more troops in Afganistan, we need to do more over there, blah, blah, blah, and I think he is over there right now.

If he is so dead set against the Iraq war and supposedly was never for it, what is the difference here? Why is he so for sending more troops and doing more in Afganistan? Is it because he just wants to do the opposite of Bush? And why are the liberal biased media going along over on his overseas trips to make a big circus out of it?

I think it is apparent that Obama was “shamed” into going over there by McCain. This is merely a political show and of course the liberal press is just being the liberal press. It seems that the liberal press has no problem showing more and more how bias they are and the kool-aid drinkers just keep drinking it up.