
SG History 10101 Jan 2006
Ministry or Entertainment?
One of the most persistent controversies in the long history of gospel music has been is whether its primary purpose is to minister or to entertain audiences. It remains an issue today for many in gospel music. This article will not necessarily answer that question, but its intent is to shed some light on the history of this issue and perhaps assist in the reader making that decision for him or herself. From the beginnings of the tradition we have come to call southern gospel music in the mid-nineteenth century, the purpose of music in church has been a subject of debate and discussion. The complete study of the origins of professional gospel music is outside the focus of this article, and deserves an article of its own. For the purposes of this article, I will summarize the consensus of all the stories of the beginnings of those traditions. The rise of the Pentecostal movement and the consequent establishment of singing schools and singing conventions in the mid-nineteenth century were the main impetus for specialty singers of gospel song. The pioneering efforts of men such as Aldon Kieffer, Ephraim Roebush, and A.J. Showalter initially were the agents that began a gospel music industry, with their popularization of the shape-note method of singing and their publishing of song books that popularized those techniques. ![]() James D. Vaughn Enter James D. Vaughan, a Tennessean who, as a boy, became fascinated with music and the shape-note method of singing. When he turned 18, he began the first of many singing schools bearing his name and products, and in order to help sell his song books and other musical products to people, he established a quartet of men to sing the songs in his books, an demonstrate the virtues of his singing methods. Out of this came the first professional gospel singing groups, since the material in Vaughan's books consisted of religious music of the day. Quartets began to form in the various places where Vaughan had conducted singing schools, and by 1910, Vaughan happened on the idea to form a travelling professional quartet to help his burgeoning music publishing business grow. The great success of the original Vaughan Quartet and other quartets under his sponsorship convinced anyone paying attention that there was money to be made in performing gospel songs before audiences. ![]() V. O. Stamps The quartet craze began to sweep the South, and soon other intrepid people began to rise up from the Vaughan organization and establish publishing empires of their own. Probably the most successful Vaughan alumnus was Texan Virgil O. Stamps, known by his initials, V.O., a fine singer himself, and a restless, visionary businessman. By the 1920s, this method of using travelling quartets to sell religious music to people had caught on so successfully, the competition in the songbook field began to get intense. With the help of his brother Frank, also a fine singer and manager of a prominent quartet, and his business partner, J.R. Baxter, Jr., Stamps' Stamps-Baxter Company became the leading music publishing company in the South. For quite some time, Stamps-Baxter quartets competed with Vaughan quartets at singing conventions, fairs, and whatever venues they managed to appear at. Because of the desire to outsell the competition, quartets from both organizations worked as hard as they could to entertain the audiences as best as possible, and with Frank Stamps' quartet also getting into the brand new field of records, there was another medium that the various singers and their companies would try to conquer to establish loyal followings. Although it was certainly true than men like Vaughan, Stamps, Showalter, and Homer Rodehaver were motivated to assist churches and other ministries of the time musically, clearly the focus of their work was on maintaining a business, and doing it as successfully as possible. Arguably their work was their way of contributing to ministry in their individual ways. Nevertheless, the focus remained on the businesses, and whatever made them most successful was utilized. Along with all this activity, the new medium of radio was beginning to be used to establish new singers…people from all stations in life intent on making a living through the singing of gospel songs. Groups like the Speer Family from Alabama, the Blackwood Brothers from Mississippi, and the LeFevre Trio from Tennessee (and later Atlanta) aligned themselves with music companies and radio stations to establish themselves, and travelled where they could to promote themselves and their singing. ![]() Chuck Wagon Gang circa 1938 Around that time, a group from Texas began to attract attention with their simple, heartfelt renderings of traditional and new gospel songs. They were not affiliated with any of the music companies, and like many of their contemporaries, didn't limit their repertoire to solely gospel songs. The Chuck Wagon Gang, led by Dave (Dad) Carter and featuring his children, were endearing themselves to audiences on radio, first in Lubbock, and later in Dallas over powerful station WBAP. Initially they did mostly western songs, with only occasional gospel material thrown in, but as listener response indicated that their gospel material was better liked, eventually they began to incorporate gospel more and more into their repertoire, until by 1940, the group had eliminated all of the western and folk material they had been singing, and stuck to strictly gospel thereafter. That same year, the Chuck Wagon Gang signed the first of many contracts with Columbia Records, an alliance that would last some four decades. But ask Dad Carter if he was doing a ministry or entertaining, and he would say, "This is the way I make my living. I am an entertainer." No doubt most professional gospel singers of the day saw themselves in the same way. Although many of them were raised in churches, and sang the songs they were singing because they loved them and thought people needed to hear the message in them, the attitude at that time didn't appear to allow for the singers of those days to think of themselves as anything but singers entertaining people with good, inspiring songs. ![]() Blackwood Brothers circa 1937 But as groups like the Chuck Wagon Gang, the Blackwood Brothers, the Speers, and the LeFevres gained popularity, and thus exposure, it was a portend that changes were nigh in the gospel music industry. Next month, I'll examine the rise of the Statesmen Quartet, and how the changes they affected in gospel music helped further to establish the lines in this alleged conflict between ministry and entertainment in gospel music. Reader Comments
Gospel singing isn't ordained to be a ministry. God has ordained the only the five-fold ministry to be that which is called. I'm not saying that you can't minister when you're singing in a group, but to truly call it a ministry is not found in the New Testament.
Commented by On 01/09/2006
TJ [mam/sir]? ---With all due respect, what would your definition of "ministry" be? Within the body of most churches there are MANY types of ministries. Seems that you have very narrow version of what ministry is. Perhaps giving you the benefit of the doubt, in philosophy or theology, one could possibly exclude singing from "Ministry"? I don't see that myself however. It would be interesting to me hear how you came to that conclusion that singing is not a minsitry. No offense with my comments to you on that particular subject but I strongly disagree as will many other people.
Commented by On 01/09/2006
John,
Looks like your article this month has inspired some to join the "is gospel singing ministry or entertainment" debate. This debate, as you eloquently point out, has been going on for quite some time, and is destined to continue. Personally, when I attend a gospel concert, I am there for entertainment.....but, I fully expect to receive a blessing........and I always do. Thanks for another informative article about the music that I love best.
Commented by On 01/11/2006
Another great article, John.
But, I think some are taking the basic direction of your article off-track. What I hear you saying is that, primarily, groups were originally hired to sing for business reasons - to demonstrate the song books and allow people to hear the songs. I remember in the 60's going into my favorite record shop downtown where the proprietor would pull a brand new RCA Stereo Blackwood Brothers album off of the shelf (at my request) and than break the shrink wrap and play a song or 2 from it - demonstrating what the album sounded like. When I was a teenager and had to be selective as to which albums I could afford to shell out 5 whole bucks for (can you imagine?), this helped me decide which ones to buy. It would be a stretch to say that the record store proprietor was involved in the "ministry" of playing Gospel records for evangelistic purposes. He clearly was displaying his wares for busines purposes - and there is certainly nothing wrong with that. A salesman at a Bible Book Store would certainly not be doing something wrong in showing me four or five choices in Bibles I was considering to purchase - but this would clearly be the demonstration of product - not the spreading of God's Word - even though it caused me to read the pages. His motivation and purpose there in the store was to sell Bibles. And the early Gospel Groups, for the most part, had a great job. They got to sing songs about Jesus for a living while supporting their families and helping their employers sell song books. Nothing wrong with that - sure beats digging a ditch all day long. But, it's my guess that John is going to deal in the days ahead with how God took what was happening and found a way to use it for evangelistic purposes and to see souls won to His kingdom. Groups began to learn how to minister through their songs, with God's help, and the God who promised that His Word would never return to Him void - began to use the words of the songs to touch peoples' lives and to be glorified. Nothing wrong with that either. I don't understand the controversy between ministry vs entertainment. When I was in Bible College preparing for the ministry, I was taught to prepare and deliver a sermon in a way that would entertain and keep the attention of the audience - while being sure to minister effectively to their needs. I was taught that I would be able to reach more people if I would hone my craft so I could be more interesting and entertaining in my presentation - as more would come to hear me. And I do not believe that Jesus, who worked many miracles that attracted crowds to His teaching, has a problem with that. John 6:2 says that the multitudes followed Him because of His miracles. Jesus did not stop doing miracles - because of wishing they would follow Him because of His more-important teaching. Rather, He kept doing miracles - drawing larger crowds that He could then influence with His teaching. That makes sense to me. There is a reason why Ernie Haase & SS draws greater crowds than we do. They are more entertaining than we are. As a result, I am sure more will accept the Lord because of their ministry in 2006 than will through ours. So, I will work with my group to be much more entertaining - for the good motive of being able to ultimately reach more people for Christ. It is hard to reach them - if they sat home watching TV the night I was in their town. Certainly, some groups see themselves as entertainers only. But, Gospel Music evolved to a state where people started coming to the Lord and being uplifted as a result of their SHOWING UP at the concerts - coming in the first place to have a good time. And, I think this evolution of Gospel Music is where John is going in this excellent history lesson he is providing for us. So, what's wrong with having a good time while we are being ministered to? Our favorite preachers afford us that opportunity on a regular basis - why not our favorite singers?
Commented by Cliff Cerce On 01/13/2006
One other thought -
Someone has previously posted that Gospel Music is excluded from the 5-fold ministry. This is a very narrow opinion, at best. The "5-fold ministry" refers to the list Paul gave in Ephesians 4. They are listed in verse 11 as apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers. Some contend that this is really a "4-fold" ministry - taking the position that "pastors and teachers" were one of four divisions. Regardless, evangelists are clearly included. Evangelists are, by definition, those that travel spreading the message of the Gospel. A pastor's ministry is generally centered in one place - while an evangelist travels all over. We are evangelists in the truest sense. We not only sing from town to town - we also present the Gospel in the spoken word. Before one tries to downplay a Gospel group's involvement in speaking and preaching the word - remember that there has NEVER existed a Gospel group in modern times who has not been accused regularly of "talking too much and not singing enough" in church services. If you say that singers are not especially mentioned in Paul's list, I will also point out that neither are missionaries. Next to Jesus, Paul was the greatest missionary of all time. I wonder if he felt he belonged in the 5-fold ministry?
Commented by Cliff Cerce On 01/13/2006
Deon Unthank
Some people are like Slinkys… Not really good for anything, but they
Commented by On 01/14/2006
Does anyone know how to get permission to use stamps and baxter music on a missionry cd presentation? Its on an old cassete tape I have called Gospel Sing-a-Long ZLP 954s.
Commented by On 01/16/2006
How can a gospel group stand on stage, for an event that sells tickets, stand on stage and sing the same set they did the night before, get paid a flat that is contractually bound, and call it ministry? Paul was an apostle...as well as an evangelist, but he didn't have a flat rate to go and preach, he was led of the Holy Ghost. Groups many times have to call, desperately for bookings and dates, just to make payroll...again, I dont see how that is defined as ministry.
Commented by On 01/17/2006
TJ,
If you were privy to many of the dealings and negotiations between board and pastor (both when the pastor originally comes to the church - and at times when he is seekig a raise) - you would probably not call a pastor part of a real ministry - regardless of what Paul wrote in Ephesians 4. After all, the very definition of "ministering for a flat" is being the salaried Pastor of a church. If that isn't accepting a flat for ministry, then nothing is. And, even though "evangelists" are specifically mentioned as part of the 5-fold ministry in Ephesians 4, one many not want to hear their favorite evangelist minister at their home church for a week if they knew of the negotiations and "guarantees" they had to obtain in order to arrive there - including stipulations concerning the nature of lodging and meals. And - talk about making a lot of phone calls to secure a booking...... I do not criticize a pastor or evangelist for how they conduct their business - nor am I saying that I disapprove of salaried positions. I am too busy trying to be faithful to my Lord to what He has required of me to judge another of His servants. But, I believe that Jesus made it clear that "fruit" was the indication of what constituted a true ministry. Rather than paint everything with broad brushes (pastors are in real ministry - Gospel singers are not), a proper Scriptural approach would be to examine the fruit of each individual ministry. I believe that one would find that some pastors and singers are merely hirelings - while other singers and pastors are true ministers - and the fruit consistently born to their ministry bears this out. For the record - we do not "call desperately for bookings" but generally seek to go through the doors that the Lord has opened for us. One of my biggest failings is that I do not spend enough time on the phone, contacting every referral we have received from churches and pastors where we have been - and I am purposing to do better at that this year. And, we still go everywhere on a free-will offering basis, and it is sufficient to support us. However, I do not criticize others who reach agreements beforehand with churches as to how they will be compensated. That is as much between them and the churches as it is when the church and the pastor reach an agreement about the pastoral salary package. But, I'm a little offended that someone can label a group that consistently sees at least a hundred souls saved every year a non-ministry - while being aware that most churches and pastors do not see a hundred souls won each year - yet they are considered ministries because of the terminology. It seems to put aside what Jesus said about bearing fruit. Does anyone else out there see it like we do?
Commented by Cliff Cerce On 01/17/2006
TJ, the same thing could be asked of many evangelists or pastors. They preach the same sermons, they negotiate their fees, and many of them beg for bookings in order to meet payroll. None of that makes it any less of a ministry.
Commented by On 01/17/2006
|
About This Article
Ministry or Entertainment?
Favorited by: (What's an RSS feed?) Recent FeaturesArchives |
|