Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join our Email Newsletter

Sunday Edition


01
Jan
2005
The Trojan Horse Of Southern Gospel Music


Add this entry to Your Favorites | [0] Favorites [63] Comments

image

As usual, I plan to give you a massive dose of "TRUTH", and my solution, but before I do I want to address last month's article.

When I agreed to write these monthly articles it was with the understanding that I could write freely on any subject relating to SGM. It is my choice to cover controversial topics and I am grateful for the opportunity. I am also aware that this choice exposes me to criticism, but I'm a "big boy" and I can take it. It is indeed satisfying when my articles "stir up the pot" and provide fuel for honest and open discourse. However, I would never sacrifice my personal integrity for this purpose so I will state now that Mrs. Smith's letter is real. The facts are exactly as I stated them. She did not write to me anonymously, but when I asked if I could use her personal letter to me she requested that I not use her real name…smart Lady. Since she was writing to me in private she undoubtedly was more candid than she would have been if she thought her letter would be published in public. This is why, I suspect, that some took offense at the tone of some of her questions. I can understand the natural curiosity that some of you have voiced concerning her identity, but she has the right to her privacy and I have the right to not reveal my sources. Now all of you who doubted "Uncle Nick" say "I Believe Nick" three times, send a "love offering" to the New York Yankees, and slap your knuckles with a ruler.

This month I want to talk about:

THE TROJAN HORSE OF SOUTHERN GOSPEL MUSIC

I've just finished a book by John C. Maxwell titled "The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork". One of my favorite chapters is "The Law Of The Scoreboard".

The scoreboard is a critical component of every sport. That's why it's so visible at every stadium, arena, and ball field. You can walk into any game at half time, look at the scoreboard and know pretty well what's going on. It's amazing how many people try to succeed without a scoreboard. A simple thing like a budget is a scoreboard, yet many families try to succeed without it and wonder why they can't get ahead.
THE SCOREBOARD DOESN'T LIE AND IN THE END NOBODY CAN WIN WITHOUT THE SCOREBOARD. Competing without a scoreboard is like bowling without pins, you're working real hard but you really don't know how you're doing.

The Southern Gospel Music Industry is ignoring the scoreboard. In every category across the board we are dead last, yet we absolutely refuse to admit we are losing. However, the scoreboard doesn't lie and we are losing. It seems to me we would rather keep ranting about how great SGM is ("I love SGM!..yeah man, it's the greatest!…awright!…way to go!….high five!") than to look at the scoreboard and realize that it's "crunch time".

Now back to the matter at hand…the reason SGM is in such shambles.

Years ago I met a simple country man that happened to be the number one salesman for his company. When I asked him for the secret of his success he replied, "Braggin' ain't braggin' if you back it up", implying that he could be proud of his product to deliver the promise. In SGM we do a lot of "Braggin'" but very little "Backin' up".

When SGM first came on the national scene in the mid 50's it was represented by groups like The Blackwood Brothers and The Statesmen. These groups were appearing on network television and were being heard by millions of people, and the truth is, they were as good or better than anyone in the secular music world. Let me repeat that since it is the crux of my article. The Blackwood Brothers and The Statesmen were as good or better than any singers in the secular music world. They were accepted by the world because of their talent and ability to entertain and, as a result, were given the opportunity to present the Gospel in song to the world…and the world liked it!

Almost the exact opposite is true today. Very little of the music we now present is acceptable in musical terms and therefore people don't like it and don't buy it, and we are relegated to singing to ourselves. But, if we really are sincere about ministering and abiding by Luke 14:23…who are we fooling?

We are all familiar with the story of the Trojan Horse. The Greeks attacked the city of Troy. They thought the battle would be over in a few weeks but it lasted for ten years. Finally the Greeks built the Trojan Horse and presented it as an offering to the Goddess Athena. The Trojans took the horse into the city and, late at night the Greeks who were hidden in the horse opened the city gates from the inside and the Greek army came through the gates and took the city of Troy.

THE TROJAN HORSE OF SOUTHERN GOSPEL MUSIC IS RADIO PROMOTION!

This "scam" has come into our industry and opened the gates to allow access to any Tom, Dick, and Mary who can pick up a guitar. We are over-run with companies that will sign them on to do a recording and radio promotion and, before you can say "rip-off", they're sent out to radio. This is not to be confused with custom recording, which actually serves a purpose by providing product for artists to sell. But when it's tied to radio promotion…it's a "scam".

In the world of music, record companies make their money by selling recordings to the buying public. This is their main source of revenue.

In SGM we feed on ourselves. The companies of which I speak make little or no money by selling product at the retail level. They make their money by bringing in one group after another and selling them a small order of CDs and radio promotion. The only sales made are what the group sells at their appearances, which averages about 500 units per year. The companies could not survive if the flow of groups stopped, hence the continual hype directed at the artists. Because there is no attempt to reach the market place, all the revenue is derived by selling to the artists. It's a never ending cycle, and the down side is that the groups have bought into this "gobbledygook". The result is an industry that is flooded with ill-prepared, poor singing, artists, and a radio industry that is mostly comprised of low watt stations that serve as much purpose as sending our music to chicken coops and gas stations.

We could move SGM forward 20 years by stopping this foolishness, and the key to doing that is EDUCATING THE ARTISTS.

I had a part time group in my office that had three songs on the charts in one year, one in the top 12.The only sales were made by the group. In terms of benefit to the group, the result is ZIP!…ZERO!...NADA! They are still struggling.

In my opinion, the only radio promoters that are worth anything are the ones promoting artists that have exposure at the retail level.

Here is the heart of the matter. Radio Promotion, The Trojan Horse of SGM, has opened the gates to these artists and created an industry of "Mutant Ninja Singers" with a gene missing…the singing gene.
How many artists in SGM are on a par musically with the secular music world?
How many artists in SGM get up every day and work 6 to 8 hours perfecting their singing?
How many artists in SGM understand music?
How many artists in SGM can actually sing? The answer to all these questions is…very few.
The reason there is not much SGM in bookstores is that it doesn't sell. It doesn't sell because it is poorly sung, poorly produced music that appeals to a very small market.

The SGM that I cut my teeth on was wonderful. The men and women that were our pioneers were passionate about their singing. Sadly, that is no longer true. The music is still wonderful, but the new breed of "singers" that is flooding through the gate is only interested in "getting our name out there" by getting on the charts. If most of them were put on trial for singing, they wouldn't serve one day in jail. You can promote songs on the radio until the cows come home, but if you can't sing you are wasting your time and money. The real test of a song's success is retail sales. Retail sales and chart position are joined at the hip. It defies logic to have a song high on the charts that is not selling at retail. It also speaks volumes about the current state of our charts.

If your product is not going out to retail stores you have no business sending it to radio. Take the money and learn how to sing. That's how to "get your name out there".

A prime example of this is The Booth Brothers. I have been working with them for about seven years, and I am certainly not implying that I am responsible for their success, but I am proud to say that I had a hand in it. They have had very little, if any, help from radio. They have worked tirelessly on their singing. In the studio their motto is "one more time, we can get it better, please, one more time". Today they are one of the top artists in Gospel Music.

We can argue the pros and cons of improving SGM all day long (as many obviously do), but the real, rubber meets the road, TRUTH is that until we address the lack of talent that has permeated our industry, chances of improvement are "slim to none".

We can also debate the changes that are needed, but that is not my argument. I DO NOT WISH TO CHANGE SOUTHERN GOSPEL MUSIC! I LOVE THE MUSIC! I WANT TO MAKE THE MUSIC BETTER!

What I am proposing is real change in the attitude of our artists, a grass roots effort to educate our artists. In my view we have lost sight that this business is about singing.
It is not a question of changing SGM as an art form; it's about improving the music we love so it will be appealing to others. We need more real singers, arrangers, and producers that actually know what they're doing.

This is not about what SGM is, it's about what it's not…good music!

It's not about whether the music is progressive or traditional; it's about making our art form, our music, our style, musically sound.

One of the reasons the Bill Gaither homecoming tour is so successful is this: if you can't sing you will not be on that stage.

My friends, the scoreboard doesn't lie. It accurately reflects your position. Many losing teams try to convince themselves that a new stadium or arena will bring in the crowd. It will not. A winning team can draw a crowd in an open parking lot. The same is true for you. Are you selling lots of product? Are your crowds good to excellent? Is your date book full? Are you bringing in good revenue? These are the facts that are posted on your scoreboard. You can hide your head in the sand if you choose to, but that will not change the score.

Our industry is rife with companies that will try to tell you otherwise, but the one indisputable truth you can use to assess the merits of their sales pitch is this: Does the company receive its revenue by selling product at the retail level or by selling product and radio promotion to the artists?

Here is a challenge to my good friends Deon and Susan Unthank. If you want to have a chart that is light years ahead of the rest, tie your charts to retail sales. You may only have 15 artists on your chart but you will have the only accurate chart in the world of SGM.

I leave you with this thought.

If the future existence of Southern Gospel Music hinged on a one hour performance by one group to the world…which group would we send to do the job?

I know who I'd send, but let me know who you would choose. I'll reveal my choice and yours next month. You may be surprised!

As always, I welcome your comments.

God Bless You
Nick Bruno

Reader Comments

Another great article, Nick. I appreciate your wisdom and candor in discussing the current issues facing SGM. I can only hope that enough artists will read your article and understand what you are saying. Unfortunately, I’m afraid there will be many that think you are preaching to “all of those groups” and that “our group is one good song away from making it big”. Not to be a discourager, but many groups need to take a hard look at their scoreboard (their financial books, their date book, the number of decisions for Christ, etc.) to determine where they fit into the SGM industry. I like to think of the SGM hierarchy as similar to the organization of professional baseball. Of course you’ve got the Major League, but you’ve also got AAA, AA, A, and the Rookie League. Not everyone that plays professional baseball has the talent to make it to the Majors, but they have enough talent that someone, somewhere will pay to see them play. I believe we have too many Rookie League, A, and AA groups thinking they can buy their way into the Major Leagues by signing with the right agent. Relating it back to your article, the only person benefiting from that relationship would be the agent. Only in this case, the agent would also be the team owner and the player would be paying to be on the team. I know the analogy isn’t perfect, but I hope the point is understood.

As for your question, limiting my choice to only one group I would have to go with the Gaither Vocal Band. I believe they already have some name recognition (via Bill Gaither) and I believe they would have some appeal to a wide audience – Bill to the more traditional Christian music crowd, David Phelps to a younger audience, and Guy Penrod to those that prefer country music. I’ve not seen them perform with Marsh Hall yet, but from what I’ve seen of him on the Gaither videos, it seems that he would also appeal to a younger audience. In addition to their individual appeal, they collectively have a great sound representative of the best of SGM.

Sorry for being so long-winded.

Scot Eaves



Commented by On 01/05/2005
Mr Bruno,\
Never knew about that..unbelievable.
I'd send the Gaither Vocal Band, Chosen Few, Crossway Qt.
Woulnd't send the Crabbs though unless it was to some sort of scream-therapy.
Auke


Commented by On 01/05/2005
Great article Nick. Dead on accurate. Your preachin to the choir here, but preach n brother maybe someone will begin to listen. As to group to send, thats a hard choice. But if I could send just one it would probably be Palmetto State.


Commented by Ben Harris On 01/05/2005
Excellent and thought-provoking article, Mr. Bruno. You have made a ton of very serious points to consider. As to one group to present SGM to the world, this alone is a fascinating challenge. I know a few who I would NOT send....but here are a few of my choices;

Quartet: Kingdom Heirs, Dixie Melody Boys, Legacy Five, Dove Brothers

Trio: Mark Trammell Trio, Greater Vision, Booth Brothers

Family: Hayes Family, Whisnants, Magruders, Hoppers (and wish the Goodmans were still around!)

Keep up the tremendous articles.


Commented by On 01/05/2005
Dear Nick : I have known you for a long time,I
agree with some of your spin,but not all of it.I
would send a person in Gospel music,that had a
combination of (A great singer,a Godly person that
knows Christ personally,a trustworthy,person,one
whose ministry has been blessed by God minus the
politics in Gospel music,one who sings next to the
hearts of God's people,one who knows God's Word)
that would be Squire Parsons. Nick......God's
benchmark,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Commented by On 01/05/2005
I agree with the general premise of this article -- that in order for things to be better, the quality of what we do must improve. However, I want to point out a few things that tilts the scoreboard in favor of other genre that may not be in our best interest.

1. Many more people want to hear songs about unsavory things than about the gospel of Jesus Christ. Many more people want to hear songs about sentimental things than want to hear about the Kingdom of God.

2. Objective musical quality is not directly proportional to CD sales. Most people, especially teenagers, by CDs more for image than for musical quality. If musical quality was the standard for CD sales, Beethoven's 9th Symphony or Handel's Messiah would be at the top of the charts instead of the drivel we hear on mainstream radio.

With these two thoughts in mind, I want to make a couple of observations about the genre some are pushing SG to be like -- CCM. The singers and musicians that make up the garage bands that dominate CCM are not any better musicians than most of the SG artists that are on the radio today. And the message of theirs songs are not spiritually challenging for either Christians or sinners. CCMs sales have skyrocketted the last few years because they have cashed in on the image-conscious youth and have watered-down the lyrics.

Is that what we want to do? I did not think so. I do agree with the article. I just don't think that the right improvements will change the scoreboard as much as we might think. Remember, when Jesus improved his quality, by preaching the tougher, true gospel, His crowds shrank.


Commented by Keith Prater On 01/05/2005
As usual, your column was thought provoking. Having been taken advantage of by some of the so called record companies in the past, I now can see your perspective, however, many times, some quality talent gets buried on a compilation full of lesser talent.

I believe that there are many regional groups that could make it at a higher level if given the opportunity. They may need some guidance along the way like better arrangements and better material but the talent is there. I believe that is why many of these groups fall into the trap that the recording companies have sprung. Many times, these things are promised to lure you to the company. In fact, some of the great groups of the past have been known more regionally than nationally, such as the Prophets and the Rebels. Can you deny their talent or success. Those were also groups that became the talent pool for the better know groups.



I know that on average that most "local groups" are average at best but I do think that the ones who rise above the others should not be punished because they are "local". After all, technically, every group is local. Everyone is from somewhere. In NC the Hoppers, Dixie Melody
Boys, Kingsmen and Inspirations are local groups. For radio stations to refuse to play the quality regional groups is ridiculous when most of them are playing nationally known groups that are not as good.

I know that I have strayed a little from the main theme. I have heard all of my life from pastors as well as promoters the statement, "this group is not here to entertain us but to minister to us." Even though there is some truth to that statement, I feel that in order to reach the unchurched, we must strive to be entertaining in order to get their attention. The music that we choose should do the ministering. After all, it is the message in the music that separates us from the crowd.

As far as what groups to send, I would agree with the Booth Brothers, Signature Sound, Greater Vision, the Lesters, the Hoppers. All of these groups sing outside the box when it comes to arranging. There are others as well.


Commented by On 01/05/2005
Brother Keith;

What you have just written is absolutely right on. BOTH of your points are hugely true, and very applicable to this discussion. Thanks for making them.

In thinking of Nick's challenge to pick one group, after considering my earlier answer of several hours ago, I neglected 2 current entries worthy of consideration; the Old Time Gospel Hour Quartet, and the Perrys.

However; in my 40 years of loving this music, if I had ONE group, and only one group from 4 decades to represent Christ through SGM, it would be the Couriers; Dave Kyllonen, Duane Nicholson, and Neil Enloe. Excellent voices. Great arrangements. Neil was as good a songwriter as any of his era. And their Christian testimonies were impeccable. They literally travelled the entire world, representing their Savior, and they did it for over 30 years without a single taint of suspicion or inconsistency. They were Christians first, and everybody knew it.

Thanks for letting me say this. I admire them immensely.


Commented by On 01/05/2005
Crabb Family or Mercy's Mark....but if picking only one, it would be Crabb Family. they have the retail sales.


Commented by On 01/06/2005
Great article again....

As program director of southwest Missouri's largest radio station, I can verify that I too often get radio compilation cds from promotion companies that generally end up in the trash. We love the big names in sgm, but also constantly search for new, up-and-coming groups.

But, we screen all music before it goes on the air. So, even if you've been convinced to pay thousands to a promoter to get on their latest disc to radio, if it isn't quality, you won't get airplay on KWFC.

Nick's right, spend the money to 1) learn to sing, then 2) put a great project together.

As far as the one group I'd put before the world...hands down the Crabb Family. Could've gone with the Gaither Vocal Band. They've got the name recognition, fabulous sound and can do a variety of music. The Crabb Family also have a fabulous sound, variety and growing name recognition. But, there's one difference, age. The youthfulness of the Crabb Family will attract younger people to sgm whereas young adults probably don't relate as well to the vocal band.

There's my two-cents worth,
Kyle


Commented by Kyle Dowden On 01/06/2005
Page 2 of 7 Comment Pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

Add Comments

If you are seeing this form you are not a Member or have not logged in. Why not consider becoming a Member?

Membership allows you to have a prepared signature of your choice applied to every comment you make, as well as the ability to choose an avatar to display next to your name to help identify your posts. Members are also given opportunity to vote weekly in our Weekly Chart as well as special Members Only contests, polls and giveaways during the year. If you are already a member, login here, otherwise please register here.

**Note: Forums membership is a seperate membership.

By posting you agree to our Comments Policy

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
Comment:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Please enter the word you see in the image below: