SouthernGospelNews.com - your online source for all southern gospel music news

May

2006

The DaVinci Code

Add this entry to Your Favorites | [0] Favorites

[52] Comments

In a recent correspondence with someone very dear to me, the controversy over the book about the DaVinci Code came up. A simple and sincere question was asked of me. I have tried to respond to this question and the collateral ones that followed with a brief overview of biblical perspectives. Perhaps, this may help others who struggle with how to sort out all the voices that are supporting this and other literary works that are flooding the bookshelves in our country.

Please feel free to write your questions or comments to this article.

Dear Dr. Frazier

I read the DaVinci Code because of all the hype that surrounds it. Besides being a complete work of fiction, it is ultimately a murder mystery. Obviously, it does promote some "out-there" ideas of Jesus marrying Mary Magdalene and having children. But this book endeavors to take nothing away from Jesus. It never claims that He didn't rise from the dead or ascend to the Father. It only promotes the fictional idea that it might be possible that before He died, He got married and it was something that was hidden by the Roman Catholic Church. People who have never read it assume the worst, in that Dan Brown is debunking Jesus as the Christ. Think about it: what if Jesus did get married? What would it change? Would He no longer be the Christ? In my opinion, it doesn't take anything away from Him at all. It means that He can better relate to married men, if anything.

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your views but I think you're trying to defend the indefensible. What would it change, you asked, if Jesus had married and had children? THE ENTIRE GOSPEL!

He would have created a genetic link to God by natural generation rather than by spiritual rebirth. You would not have to be saved because God would be you BIOLOGICAL progenitor. Since the expression has been coined, "God has no grandchildren" (meaning, just because your parent was a Christian makes you a Christian) would be voided and everyone would, by physical birth, be a child of God. This is currently espoused by the Existentialists who negate the need of salvation by referring to "the Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of man." They say that when you are born, God is your Father and all humanity forms your core of siblings. Your physical existence supplies the only connection you need to Deity. Therefore, there is nothing you can do or should do to have a relationship with God. It came with your birth certificate!

While the Catholics consider Mary as the "Queen Mother", you would have an entire race that can legitimately claim that Jesus' wife is indeed their biological mother. If Jesus had progeny, THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE TO GET SAVED AND THEY COULD NEVER BE LOST. This would establish an "automatically saved" doctrine that neither requires consent and belief, nor personal responsibility. In contradistinction to this fallacy, The Bible declares that ALL must receive Christ "by faith" (Roms.10:10). Are you sure you want to deviate that far from the Gospel?

David said, "I was born in sin". That principle would cease to be true if there was a special genealogical line of Jesus' roaming the earth. Just like the Rephaim that were part human ("the daughters of men") and part angelic ("the sons of God"), you would have a super race of half Jesus/half human ethnicity which would not need a Savior, the Cross or to be born again (lit. "From above").

When you have an admixture of fiction with fact you are leaving it to the discretion of the reader to delineate one from the other. This is a highly dangerous endeavor since many readers may be unable to make the separation because of their lack of knowledge in the particular field of study. Two major literary works that have caused incalculable harm using this masking technique are, "The Book of Mormon" and "The Koran".

When a noted cult leader, for instance, stated his views condoning Polygamy and Celestial Marriages, readers believed him. Since he copied certain Scriptures directly from The Bible, how were they to know when something like these two spurious concepts was "unscriptural"? Jesus said, "A little leaven ("error, heresy") leavens the whole loaf". He declares that the influence of error is not confined to just a little space but spreads throughout and it ALL is contaminated. In other words, something that contains both fact and fiction is FICTION! It needs to be plainly declared as such. Religious books that pretend to be factual, while containing error, only serve to create confusion and deception.

The American society has certainly seen the escalation of Constitutional Revisionists who have altered the purity of the original document by declaring, "FICTIOUSLY", that the framers had in mind the guarantee that anyone can peddle smut, spew filth, remove prayer and God from the schools and public forums, murder babies in their mother's womb, project hard-core pornography depicting beastiality, incest, child molestation, and other vile acts without censure. No one, in their right mind, believes this. Yet, millions have been influenced by Satan wiles and subscribe to and defend this deviant mentality. They have set their course to change the American Constitution to reflect their amoral mindset.

The Bible shows us from the opening pages that one of Satan's tactics is to mix the Truth with error. His statement to Eve in the Garden is a preview of how he will take a statement from God and "add to or take away" from the purity of His Word. Revelation gives a strict warning, with ultimate punishment waiting, for anyone who dilutes the Word of God. God knows that dilution will bring pollution and this will result in their exclusion from His presence.

The Bible warns us of (1) "The Gainsaying of Korah" who challenged the authority and finality of God's Word (Jude v11 and Numbers 16) ; (2) "The Way of Cain" (Jude v11) which was to ignore God's instructions with no regard for human life; (3) "The Way of Balaam" ( 1 Peter 2:15) which was to say or do anything for money; (4) "The Error of Balaam" (Jude v11) which was to rely on his own mentality, instead of God, to exercise his gift of prophecy; and (5) "The Doctrine of Balaam" (Rev.2:14) which taught God's people to corrupt themselves by conjoining themselves with the corrupt world's system with the promise that there would be no penalty from God incurred.

The logic portrayed in the "what difference does it make" mentality is yet another way to circumvent the ABSOLUTE necessity of Calvary. If Jesus had intended to set up His Kingdom here in a natural way at that time, He would be nothing more than a monarch. His progeny would have inherited His Kingdom in a purely physical dimension rather than the spiritual dimension He declared to His disciples. He would now be the "Father of the Kingdom" and replace Jehovah as the ETERNAL Heavenly Father. When people would call out, "Abba, Father" who would answer them? Would Jesus' offspring have to cry "Abba, GRANDfather" when approaching God?

While I have never read the book, I'm sure others did before they wrote their comments on the Da Vinci Code. With the various articles available warning readers of major concerns, I'm wondering how you missed seeing the obvious. If there is ONE statement in the book that will lead someone to reject Christ as "the only way" then the book is misleading and harmful. The problem may not be with the author's INTENT, but with the CONTENT of his work. Satan can take anything and use it to discredit Christ as the ONLY way to God. If people have their eyes blinded by Satan when they hear the Bible so that they will not believe, what will stop him from deceiving people into believing this fictitious tome as Truth?

I hope this helps you in your search.

Dr. Frazier

Reader Comments

DR-O wrote: "I really don't know if Mr Brown set out to challenge the Christian faith, but he saw a premise which was sure to stir up controversy. That controversy would help him sell books and he wanted to sell a lot of them."

This is a complete pre-judgemental attack on the author. You have no idea why he wrote this book or what the circumstances are, but you just minimized him to a "guy who'll do anything to make money. This is wrong. There are two sides to every story. I agree with you where the book can be mis-leading, but why not just say that to begin with, instead of throwing the "wolves in sheep's clothing" bombs? You lose credibility with unbelievers if you talk like that---it's just as simple as that.

Then Lindsay Parks wrote "it is a blatant and frontal attack on the truth of the Bible." This is so absurd. Do you really think that the author was attacking the bible? I mean, isn't that a little over the top? Maybe he was out to write a book that would stir up some waves, but do you really think he was trying to ATTACK the bible!?

If you talk that way, then people who are unsaved won't listen to you. A better way to approach this would be

"The author I'm sure is a great guy and had only the best of intentions, but when a book like this comes out, it can really mis-lead people from the truth of the bible."

See how much more credible and level-headed that sounds? The problem with Christians today is that they're so hypocritical, oversensitive, judgemental, and don't think about what they should say before they say it. They just fire the bombs, turn unsaved people OFF and then get nowhere.

Like abortion for instance. After a mother has an abortion, no matter how they look on the outside, it's KILLING them on the inside. They really, deep down, hate themselves for having done it. ***Then along come the Christians*** Instead of saying softly and tenderly, "Abortion is wrong, but God will forgive you, and let me show you some scripture on this", Christians will become militant and scream "YOU'RE KILLED YOUR BABY, THIS WORLD IS GOING TO HELL" Do you really think that's what a mother who just had an abortion needs to hear?

The same goes for this movie. Instead of all the Christians being so "up in arms" over it and screaming silly and MINDLESS things like the "author is an evil wolf attacking the bible", they should think about what they say before they say it and respond with something like "I'm not sure of the author's intent, but the movie can be mis-leading to a non-church goer".

You have to meet people where they are if you're going to get them to hear the gospel. And yelling and screaming incessantly about one thing or another is not the way to do that.

Commented by On 05/05/2006

One more thought---what really gets me is how Christians also judge and comment on movies and things and they haven't even SEEN or READ them!!!

I realize that some things you don't have to see or read to judge---like pornography.

But take the movie "Brokeback Mountain". Everyone immediately thinks this movie is just a "When Harry Met Sally" for gay guys, and they just pre-judge it, scream at it, hold up signs and gay bash.

The movie actually was really good. Here you had two guys, who were NOT gay to begin with. Both of them had very bad fathers, and both of them had trouble growing up. All of the ingredients were there for something to happen. Then, they did something impulsively one night---then the rest of the movie is how it affects the rest of their lives. Both go on to get married and have kids.

To me, it was a movie that showed you what an addiction homosexuality can be. It was a very realistic and accurate account of how it can be and how it affects people.

Now, if this movie ended with both guys getting saved, and becoming leaders in their churches, then all of the Christians would have been hailing it as the film of the century.

Remember, sin is sin in God's eyes. If we steal a grape from a produce isle, or kill an elderly woman...to Him...it's THE SAME. SIN IS SIN.

The consequences are different down here, but sin is sin. God hates it all the same.

My point is that with Brokeback Mountain, which I went to see out of sheer curiosity (what's all the hype about), to me, it made me realize what gay people go through and gave me a better understanding about their thought process and the things they struggle with.

The movie was NOT a celebration of being gay, it was the STRUGGLE of being gay and how it affects lives.

But Christians, ESPECIALLY the ones who've never even SEEN it, just judge-judge away, and scream and yell and holler opinions on something they HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN.

Commented by On 05/05/2006

It's only dangerous when people are too stupid to understand what the words "novel" and "fiction" mean.

Sadly, many people are that stupid.

--Making hay while the sun shines--
sgnforum@musicscribe.com - BLOG - SGHistory.com

Commented by David Bruce Murray On 05/08/2006

Jorges,
Why do you think Mr. Brown wrote his book? Do you think it could be to sell lots of books and make a lot of money? I don't think he would have written it and worked so hard to promote it if he didn't expect that result. Do you think deep down in your heart that he holds the Word of God as sacred and Holy? You say that he isn't distorting anything; that he is maybe misleading; but that he is just using 'creative license' when he changes the Biblical story of Jesus' life. I know you think I am being judgmental, but that is taking away from the Word of God. When you challenge the sacrosanctity of the Word you take away from the message God wants us to know. You relegate the Bible to a collection of stories and suggestions. You seem to to believe that if a Christian believes something is wrong and expresses that thought, then he is being judgmental. If you see someone on a path which leads to a cliff, do you tell him or wait to see if he discovers it some other way?
None of us has said that Mr. Brown is a terrible, unredeemable person. We all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. None of us deserves redemption but aren't we blessed that it is offered. It came through the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross and His resurrection. I am not apologetic that I think the book and movie can cause a great deal of harm. The written word is very powerful. Mein Kampf was a badly written book, but the lies and distortions it promoted had a terrible, negative influence on many people. Everyone is responsible for the consequences of their actions and will answer for them. We will answer not only for sins of commission, but also for sins of omission. I don't have to eat poison to know that it is not good for me; or see a nuclear explosion to know I don't want it to happen. God has given me common sense to know this. The Holy Spirit gives us sense to know when things are not spiritually uplifting and good for us. The Bible is given to us to teach, to edify, encourage and lead us in the way we should go. Either a person believes it is the inviolable Word of God or they don't, but riding a fence is an uncomfortable place to be.

DR-O

Commented by On 05/08/2006

Hello DR-O,

To answer your questions. I have absolutely no idea why Mr. Brown wrote his book, or his intentions behind it. That's not for me to judge.

You also wrote:

"You seem to to believe that if a Christian believes something is wrong and expresses that thought, then he is being judgmental".

Correction: That is not what I wrote at all. You're twisting my words. I never said it was wrong to hold an opinion. What I DID take issue with was the approach Christians take when HAVING that opinion. I have an opinion on the book too, but do you see me screaming like this is armageddon? You compared Mr. Brown in your original text as a "wolf in sheeps clothing doing their best to mislead people (sic)". Then, you turn around in the next post and say "I'm not sure what Mr. Brown's intentions are with this book".

So which is it Dr. O? It sure sounds to me like you shot your mouth off and then are trying to take it back.

What your problem is (and you weren't nearly as bad as some of the other posts), is that you, along with other Christians REACT instead of RESPOND.

I'll lay it ALL OUT for you once again. And this time, maybe you should actually READ what I'm writing.

BAD RESPONSE:
a. This Mr. Brown is the work of Satan himself, he's a wolf in sheeps clothing looking to mis-lead people and change the bible.

CORRECT RESPONSE:
b. This book can be dangerous, why? Because not everyone knows the truth of the bible, and some may actually believe this as true. It's our jobs, as Christians, to pray about this, and to tell as many people we can the truth of the Gospel. I think that Mr. Browns intentions were good, because Mr. Brown himself has stated on a number of occasions that he didn't mean to hurt anyone, but his book could really mis-lead people. I don't know why he wrote the book, he'd have to answer that, but either way, the book can be mis-leading.

SO----do you see the differences in approach? Both A & B have the EXACT SAME opinion in general terms, but their approaches to dealing with it are far different.

I'll tell you this much. An unsaved person would listen to point B a LOT LOT quicker than he would point A.

Didn't Jesus say "Forgive them, for they know not what they do"??

Isn't it possible that Mr. Brown had no idea this would cause such an uproar? I mean isn't it at least POSSIBLE!?

Right winged Christians don't care---they just assume, assume, assume, and judge, judge, judge and scream evil.

This is NOT the way to meet people where they are, and this is NOT the way to win souls to Christ.

So again, in summary, I'm all FOR people having opinions. It's how they HANDLE the COMMUNICATION of those opinions. And you were wrong to compare Mr. Brown as a wolf in sheep's clothing. Maybe next time, you can give a more level headed response, and then gain more of a credibility with an unsaved person. I don't mean to come down on you hard here, because I know that your intention here was to show your support that something needs to be done about this---your intentions were good, but your approach turned out to be wrong. Maybe that's what happened to Mr. Brown??????

My neighbor is unsaved...he heard on the radio where Christians were boycotting the movie and getting all up in arms, and he said "F*&% those Christians...what the H*&^ is the big deal?? They're always screaming about something"!!!

Then, I took the time to explain to him, in simple Christian terms, calm voice, and collected approach and after I was done, he said "oh...well...that kind of makes sense I guess...why don't those people we heard on the radio convey that just like you did"?

A good friend of mine, who is now dead, and he was a flag waving athiest, walked over to my desk at work one day. He slapped down a newspaper article on my desk as if to say "hah. Read that pal."...almost like "I got this Christian guy on the ropes". The article talked about how Christians were screaming at abortion mothers saying "you killers, you just killed a human life". The author's point was that if Christians are to try to "win people to their side, they sure are going about it the wrong way..." and to "Scream like that at these guilt ridden mothers isn't very Christlike"...

Pretty profound for an admitted non-believing author.

I walked the article back over to my athiest friend and told him I agreed with everything the author wrote.

There are Christians that are flag waving and almost militant and they're ruining it for everyone else....

Commented by On 05/08/2006

Jorges-

Please let me quote a few verses germaine to this discussion, then make a few more points.

Eph. 5:11- "Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather, expose them." (ESV)

1 Thess. 5:22- "Keep away from every kind of evil." (NLT)

2 Cor. 6:14-15- "What do righteousness and wickedness have in common? What fellowship can light have with darkness? What harmony is there between Christ and Satan? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? Therefore, come out from them, and be separate; touch no unclean thing.... (says the Lord)" (NIV)

1 John 5: 19- "...the whole world around us is under the power and control of the wicked one". (NLT)

2 Cor. 11: 13-15- "...false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore, it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into the ministers of righteousness..." (NKJV)

Now then, my friend- which side are YOU on? You have, as a professing Christian, taken the side of defending both the author and work of this book/movie, AND at the same time, basically defending Brokeback Mountain.

We most fefinitely ARE to judge, and keep as far away from wickedness and evil as we possibly can. We are to have absolutely no part or fellowship in ANYTHING wicked. We are to call sin, SIN. We are to expose sin for what it really is (as Dr. Frazier so Biblically DID do.....) We are not to defend evil people, the books they write, the movies they make. We are to understand that if something does not contain truth according to the Spirit of Truth, then it has been generated by the spirit of error, and that, in fact- Satan is directly behind it. John says this bluntly in his epistles.

To read carefully what you have written, one might almost think that instead of taking the side of Biblical truths, you have instead, decided to try to defend what is evil.

Which do you think might have a more negative effect upon the unsaved at the end? I am not saying that this is how you live your life, for I do not know you. I just know what you have written.

I also know that you and I are to run from anything that even hints of evil, and have nothing to do with it; especially something that blasphemes the Person and worth of the Savior, as this book does. I also know that it is folly for a professing believer to even attempt to defend such trash.

Dr. Frazier was dead right on this one. This is the work of Satan. If you don't believe that, then sadly, you've been duped into believing his lie. I don't believe you really have- it would seem that you wrote a knee-jerk "other side of the story" response. But no spiritually-exercised Christian, living in the fear of God, would or should read or see the Da Vinci Code, OR Brokeback Mountain.

Commented by On 05/09/2006

I'm not sure the people of the opposing sides of this article are REALLY hearing each other. I know all Christians believe in loving others, and striving to lead non-believers to Christ. We must love the sinner and not the sin.

I believe it is essential that Christians speak up about this movie to let the world know that it contains many fallacies. We simply must take a stand. It is our right to defend our beliefs just as it is for others to defend theirs. We have let too many things slide in the name of political correctness.

Although I'm not sure I agree with much of what jorges is saying, he does make a somewhat valid point about the way we as Christians need to approach sinners on a personal level. Kindness and love are the only way to draw people to God. However, I don't believe we should act as if we agree with the "anything goes" mentality of modern society (and I'm not suggesting that jorges is saying that we should). No other religion that I can think of would sit idly by and allow a movie--or any other medium for that matter--that degrades their religion or religious leaders without speaking out loudly. It hits a nerve--and rightly so.

Commented by On 05/09/2006

I am afraid that Paul might find himself being described as a 'right-wing Christian' if he were here today. He's also an ultimate example that God is in the forgiving business and all who seek it can find it! Well, he was used to being misunderstood and reviled for taking a stand. But take a stand he did. He wrote to the many churches he helped found and encouraged them always to stand strong for what is righteous and true. Many Christians today seem to be afraid to take a stand. My uncle used to say, "We must stand for what is right or we'll fall for anything." No one comes to the Lord without the Holy Spirit softening their heart and mind to really 'hear' the Word of God. Then the God of the Universe did a remarkable thing; He let people have a choice whether or not to believe. We only plant a seed in a life, but we don't make the seed grow, He does. He prepares the 'ground' and only then do we do our part. Without His intervention much of our seed-sowing would fall on stony ground. We must make sure that our lives don't get over-run with the 'weeds' of half-truths and lies that can cause our crops to grow weak or fail. It is true that some Christians are inflexible and intolerant, but those are humanistic traits that following close in His footsteps, we learn to overcome by His example. While it may be true that I can't read Mr. Brown's mind, I don't believe he is an ignorant man. Did he think the 'silent majority' would not see or care; would not take a stand? Who knows for sure. I can see and hear the negative effects the DaVinci Code is having on people. I've heard people questioning the veracity of the Holy Bible. To use the excuse that it is simply literary license is not recognizing that we are responsible for what we say and do. Anytime we deny or alter the life of the Son, the gift of His sacrifice, His divinity and His resurrection, we are changing the Word of God. He tells us in Psalms 119: 103-105
"How sweet are thy words unto my taste!
yea, sweeter than honey to my mouth!
Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way.
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.
And then the wonderful words from II Timothy 3:15-17
And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

Commented by On 05/10/2006

Another thing::: When something like this comes along...why waste it with yelling and bantering and attacking on the author?

This should be an opportunity we should thank God for and SEIZE it so that we can tell people the TRUTH.

I've had several people JUST THIS WEEK ask me about the movie/book, and how much is real and isn't. This is a fantastic opportunity to witness.

But instead, lots of you choose to simply attack.

Commented by On 05/10/2006

Lindsay:

The bottom line is this: Christians need to have a more Christ like approach when things like this happen. That is NOT happening here. What's happening here is a whole lot of judging, name calling, insane "wolf" comparisons, and all around personal attacks on an author who intended to write a fictional story.

If you want to blame anyone---blame SATAN for this. Yes, I agree...he's using this to his advantage.

What troubles me is that you couldn't see the point that I was making because of your anger and frustration. You couldn't calm down enough to actually read the point I was making.

Instead, you attacked and accused ME of defending the book and Brokeback Mountain. I simply was not doing that. I was making the point that Christians make judgement on things they know nothing about, or have never even seen or read.

Choose your words wisely the next time you're eager to start screaming at something you disagree with. Are you perfect? What about your own walk with God? What things do you struggle with? What I see is anger, fighting and attacking.

If you had the chance to sit down with that author, would you call him a "wolf" to his face? Would you call him a work of Satan?

If I had the chance to sit down with him, I'd say, "hey...I know you probably had the best of intentions, but this book could really mis-lead someone who's never had the chance to really know about Jesus".

I bet he'd listen to me a lot quicker than he'd listen to you and your hurtful remarks.

In regards to your scriptures: you are the queen of spin. Bill O'Reilly would have a field day with you. We'll start with 2 Cor. 11: 13-15. Do you really think this guy is a false apostle? Do you really think the author's goal/intention was to change the bible and hope that books eventually got added? Have you asked him?

Next we'll discuss 1 John 5: 19. This is correct. I agree with you....Satan is having a field day with this. Blame HIM and HIS intentions...don't assume and judge the author when you don't even know what his intentions were. That's called PREJUDGING.

Cor. 6:14-15 has absolutely no bearing on this debate. That goes without saying. Unless you're one of those Christians who won't even go into a shopping mall, because there is a "bar" 500 feet from the store you want to go into.

Thess. 5:22 is a good verse. I love it. But how do you know what is evil and what is not? Who are you to challenge MY walk with God and what my convictions are. I felt led to go see Brokeback Mountain, to learn more about what gay people go through. Someone told me "It's not a "When Harry Met Sally" for gay guys"...this is truly realistic stuff and the struggles that go along with being gay. I watched the movie in pure shock. I sobbed several times. Not because they "didn't get together", but because of how lost they were...and how much they struggled with it.

If it's wrong for me to go see "Brokeback Mountain" then is it wrong for me to go see a movie about a man struggling with an alcohol addiction? Or a "LIFETIME" movie about a husband who's an abuser? All are addictions/afflictions. What's the difference? I see none.

I look at, and treat gay people with so much more respect now. I don't agree with their lifestyle, but many of them are truly lost, and come from very broken homes...and they shouldn't be shunned away and yelled at, they should be handled with love and prayer. It is our job to seek these types of people out and lead them to Christ. Finding a common ground and helping them to see the light. Not waving a ANTI GAY flag and screaming at them.

I've had more people tell me "you are so different than alot of other Christians I know. Because you actually LISTEN to what I'm saying...even if we don't see eye to eye, and you believe in the bible, and I don't at least you're LISTENING to me".

Do you listen Lindsay? Or do you just scream and scream away every time the latest "controversy" comes out?

And answer me this: What's the difference between going and seeing a movie about a man struggling with homosexuality (as in Brokeback Mountain---because that's how it was protrayed...as a STRUGGLE) and going to see a movie about an alcoholic? Both are struggles.

I'm getting away from the original point: Listen, and listen good. Stop screaming, and show some level headed gentleness. You're pushing the lost further away with your approach....it's as simple as that.

Commented by On 05/10/2006

Page 2 of 6 Comment Pages < 1 2 3 4 > Last »

Reader Comments

Recent Articles

Articles Archives

Syndicate