Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join our Email Newsletter

Sunday Edition


31
Oct
2005
Defense, Defense, Defense


Add this entry to Your Favorites | [0] Favorites [13] Comments

image

DEFENSE, DEFENSE, DEFENSE . . . that might be a good strategy in football, but it really shouldn't apply in songwriting. Yet that is the approach that many writers take when pitching their songs. I am convinced that songwriters are the most defensive people on the planet. When I was working for a full time publisher, I had to deal with a lot of unknown writers. When I heard a song that I liked by a new writer, I would usually contact them by phone. I could tell a lot in the first few minutes of speaking to a writer as to whether or not I was going to want to do business with that person.

I would always start out by telling the person what I liked about the song that they had sent to me. This part of the conversation always went well. It usually made their day. But the next part of the conversation was the most important part. I would then proceed to tell them about things that I thought could use improvement. This is where I would begin to find out what kind of a writer that I had on the phone. If they accepted critique as well as they did the compliments, then I might be able to work with them. But if the Defense line took the field, I knew that I was probably not going to be able to work with this individual.

No one ever had trouble accepting the compliments. But about 90% of the people I had on the phone could not accept criticism of any kind, big or small, when it came to their writing. It was as if their songs were written on stone tablets like the Ten Commandments, and the last one read, THOU SHALT NOT CHANGE MY SONG, EVER!

Now there had to be something good about the tune I was looking at, or I would have never called them. But in the two years I worked for that company, listening to new song demos everyday, I seldom found one that was a grand slam home run, ready to be recorded. Most writers, with talent, need some professional guidance to make their songs stand up in a competitive market. I was looking for songs to pitch to major recording artists, who would also be listening to new songs from the top professional writers in the business. I could not send songs that were of lesser quality, just because the writer didn't want to make changes.

Now I must admit, that accepting that criticism can be very difficult. I remember in 1981 when I gathered up enough courage, after being prodded by family and friends, to send my songs to a professional publisher. So I got out my Singing News and looked at who was publishing the hits. I found a reputable publisher and sent them a demo. A few weeks later I got a very kind letter that expressed how they liked my writing, but they felt that I needed to work on my lyrics a bit.

I took this very well. Well, if you call wanting to book a flight to Nashville and burn down their building taking it well, then I took it quite well. I was as mad as a hornet. Didn't they know how well my songs went over when I sang them in church? All my family and friends loved my writing. No one had ever said a criticizing word about my music. Why couldn't those Nashville people see that! I didn't know how to take it.

But after about a month went by, I had an interesting thought. Maybe that publisher in Nashville was right. After all, they look at songs everyday, and they pick songs that get recorded and charted. So I finally started working on my attitude, and my lyrics just as they had suggested. It wasn't too long after taking their advice, that I had my first song published. I am so glad that my first demo was not accepted, or I might have never learned the lesson I needed to learn about professionalism and flexibility as a writer.

I do hope that some of those writers that were angry with me when I suggested changes to their songs, have gone on to learn that same lesson. Songs are not our children. But sometimes we treat them as if they are. They are actually inanimate objects.

Yes, we need to be passionate about what we write. It doesn't hurt anything to be tied to a song emotionally. But we need to learn balance also and make appropriate changes to a song until it is the absolute best that it can be.

If a professional industry person contacts you about a song you have written, and suggests changes, don't just change whatever they say, just because they said so. But don't disregard what they say either. Take it and consider it, pray about it. Ask God if this is the breakthrough you've been waiting for, or if you should keep pursuing other options with your music. But most of all, don't get angry at the person who has contacted you. And above all, don't start defending your song. If your song has to be defended from a professional publisher, producer, record company, or artist, then just maybe something is wrong with the song.

Until next time, keep on writing

Daryl Williams
http://www.darylwilliamstrio.net

Reader Comments

Sometimes songs are as they are meant to be, as God intended them to be, but they are just meant to be commercial.

If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit

- Galatians 5:25

Visit My Website



Commented by Keith Prater On 11/01/2005
Sometimes songs are as they are meant to be, as God intended them to be, but they are just NOT meant to be commercial. Sorry I left out the most important word in the previous post.

If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit

- Galatians 5:25

Visit My Website



Commented by Keith Prater On 11/01/2005
I wondered what you were getting at, Keith!

I know criticism is hard to take and it can sure burst your bubble but I also knew I wanted to write quality music and some who were already doing that have taken time along the way to critique my writing. In my earliest efforts the suggestions hurt more than they do now. What I found after I got over the initial shock that my songs were not ready to go (:))was their advice was right on! Now I seek out criticism from quality writers and publishers and try to follow their advice whenever I'm fortunate enough to get some of their time and advice to give.

Writers need to recognize that it's hard to be heard and taken seriously. If someone who is successful takes the time to listen AND RESPOND the answer is THANK YOU, not how dare you!


Commented by Susan Jones On 11/01/2005
Defensive? I'm not being defensive. I'm not sure that I like your tone!
Okay, now that I got THAT out of my system, I must say that I hope someday to get a publisher as supportive and genuinely constructive as Daryl was when he did the job. I, for one, KNOW that my songs are far from perfect. Sometimes the lyrics are a bit cliched, sometimes the song needs a bridge or a pre-chorus, etc. I would rather have somebody tellme, "You know, Chris, these songs are really horrible," than to hear nothing month after month after month. Hey, I can ALWAYS write more songs, BETTER songs. I've written thousands of bad songs, and maybe a dozen good ones. Hmmm... that gives me an idea for a song...


Commented by On 11/03/2005
I understand both sides. I know that some songs are the result of working through a trial on the writers behalf and you are sharing a 'piece of your innermost self' that you normally don't share with anyone except the Lord. You are already insecure in sharing it with someone and to have that person tell you (not always in the nicest way) that it needs changed is another 'blow' added to the personal trial you are dealing with. Sometimes it feels like you have 'birthed a baby', because this message in song is a result of much pain. But on your side, Mr. Williams, although it may have been a little difficult on your end to deal with some of these unknown writers, wasn't at least a few of those songs worth the effort? Your own comments make me form the opinion that you are (or were at the time of your position with the publisher) young, arrogant and insensitive to those you were dealing with. (Although I am sure that is not the case.)
In my young married days I went through a time where God was dealing with me about some issues and I lost my job, was having problems in my marriage and I felt like a failure. I couldn't do anything right. I went for job interviews for 6 months to no avail. Then I went on an interview where I knew the person that was the personnel manager and a christian. Even though I was an emotional mess, she took a chance on me and gave me the job. She ministered to me through her kindness, lending an ear and helped to restore my faith in the Lord, others and myself. I'm not that same person I was 20 years ago, because of her kindness.
I think that SGM publishers, producers, record companies, and other artist should learn the value of a person and stop 'shooting the wounded'. Maybe if people were met with more kindness and consideration instead of 'corporate can you make me a dollar,' writers wouldn't need to be on the defensive. Anything can be said to a person if it is said in the right manner and in love. Yes, it's easier and quicker to get another stale cookie out of the jar instead of baking a new batch, but boy, fresh and hot sure beats cold and stale anyday!
ds


Commented by Donna H. On 11/04/2005
Sorry, I forgot to add that I am not against constructive criticism and understand the need to better your writing ability in order to convey and condense your message but I don't think that we should shoot first and educate them later. Nor do I think that we should sacrifice the spirit of a song just because in our 'professional opinion' it doesn't quite meet our standards. I know that the ratio is usually 1 out of a hundred songs that may make the cut, but don't ditch that one because it may take a little more effort on your part to help get the message out.

Ok, I'll shut up!

ds


Commented by Donna H. On 11/05/2005
You might not know Daryl beyond this article so let me add that Daryl is a very successful writer who takes time to work with young writers at Christian music schools and individually. He critiques in order to move the writer along and make the writing better. By doing so, they may have a hand in delivering a song to reach the masses someday.

Keep in mind Gospel Music isn't about the writer, it's about the Lord. God doesn't need sub-standard songs representing Him to the world. Writing a song for yourself and those around you can be very cathartic-- which may be the purpose of that song from the beginning. That doesn't make it ready or able to reach the masses. Daryl is referring to songs pitched with the intent of having them published and performed at the national/professional level. We have credibility problems "out there" enough as it is. It should be "our utmost for His highest."

Daryl does things right with the right motivation


Commented by Susan Jones On 11/05/2005
Your right Susan;

I don't know Mr. Williams and that is why I stated my comments as I did. "Your own comments make me form the opinion" and "Although I am sure that is not the case."
And you are right Susan, it is all about the Lord, but when it comes to determining if a song is 'sub-standard' then it boils down to another person's opinion and I guess that bothers me. I'm all about "our utmost for His highest", But isn't our utmost a continual path to reach our highest for him? So tomorrow I pray that I have grown just a little bit more like Christ and gleaned something from experiences today.

"Daryl is referring to songs pitched with the intent of having them published and performed at the national/professional level." So am I or any song that is put out there with the intent to be shared with others.

I just have a problem with 'corporate opinion' having so much control over a 'product' they are harvesting from someone that poored their blood, sweat and tears into. The writer has a spiritual and emotional investment in the product, the corporation only invest money. Every time a song is played or sung, a piece of the writers heart and spirit is out for public display for all listeners to enjoy, contemplate and even criticise. Not the corporation. I never once think of the publisher when I hear a song, but I have often said "The writer must have really been annointed when the Lord gave them that song".

ds


Commented by Donna H. On 11/06/2005
Having a song "critiqued" is different from getting "criticized."
First, I believe we should be cautious about "who" we are submitting our songs to. We are instructed in the Bible to take wise counsel. This should apply to our craft. It's easy to ask my Mom if she likes one of my songs - she always thinks they're great. Daryl is established in the field of songwriting - he is also a man of God and looked up to in the church. He would be "wise counsel" and be able to "critique" a song with the writer's best interest at heart. A writer should not submit a song for review if they are not ready to receive the instruction. When we write a song from a personal situation, we need to be able to separate our written work from the emotional side of the event. It might be a good idea to hold that particular song from being reviewed until we have completely healed from the pain.
Then there are those out there who just want to criticize...


Commented by Sally Quick On 11/06/2005
But Sally, don't you think that an 'emotional attachment' is what makes the song great? Don't we want the message of that song to emotionally attach itself to the heart of our listeners the way it effected us? Amazing Grace - can you really read those words and not be emotionally effected; and then knowing the story behind the words of "IT IS WELL WITH MY SOUL"? I get moved just thinking about it. And were those songs critiqued? What could possibly be changed about those songs to improve them?
And besides, not everyone has a 'well respected song critic' in their church or knows one personally that they have a relationship with to get wise council.

Do you have one you can spare? lol - smile


Commented by Donna H. On 11/07/2005
Page 1 of 2 Comment Pages  1 2 >

Add Comments

If you are seeing this form you are not a Member or have not logged in. Why not consider becoming a Member?

Membership allows you to have a prepared signature of your choice applied to every comment you make, as well as the ability to choose an avatar to display next to your name to help identify your posts. Members are also given opportunity to vote weekly in our Weekly Chart as well as special Members Only contests, polls and giveaways during the year. If you are already a member, login here, otherwise please register here.

**Note: Forums membership is a seperate membership.

By posting you agree to our Comments Policy

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:
Comment:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Please enter the word you see in the image below: